
Compensation decisions shape trust, retention, governance, and organizational health. Giddings Consulting Group helps nonprofit boards and executive leaders approach pay questions with clarity, practical benchmarks, and a transparent process. This is advisory support for better decisions, not legal, tax, or compensation guarantees.
Nonprofit compensation can become uncomfortable when the board, executive director, finance committee, and staff are working from different assumptions. The goal is not to chase a single perfect number. The goal is to understand the role, market context, organizational capacity, and decision process clearly enough for leadership to act responsibly.
We help organizations organize the compensation question before it becomes a conflict. That can include role scope, salary bands, benchmark-source review, executive or senior-staff pay context, board-facing memos, and practical language for documenting how a recommendation was reached.
Compensation benchmarks are useful only when they are matched to the right organization type, budget size, geography, role scope, and leadership responsibilities. We help teams compare data sources, interpret ranges, and separate market information from internal values and affordability.
This work can support board discussion around IRS reasonableness framing, but it does not replace legal or tax counsel. When a formal legal opinion, 990 review, or specialized compensation study is required, we help the organization identify what to ask and what materials to prepare.
Strong compensation work connects numbers to values. A nonprofit may need to clarify whether it wants to lead, match, or lag the market; how equity and retention should influence ranges; and how raises, new roles, and promotions should be handled over time.
Giddings Consulting Group helps boards and executives move from one-off pay decisions to a more consistent compensation framework that staff can understand and leaders can maintain.
Compensation question map and decision-risk summary
Benchmark-source review and role-comparison guidance
Draft compensation philosophy or pay-band framework
Board memo or discussion guide for executive and senior-role decisions
Governance process recommendations for documenting decisions
Referral-ready questions for legal, tax, or specialist review when needed
A clearer board conversation about pay and role scope
Better use of benchmark data without false precision
Compensation language that aligns with organizational values
Less confusion between advisory, legal, tax, and HR responsibilities
A practical path for future salary-band and review cycles
This service is for nonprofit leaders who need senior advisory support around compensation decisions, pay structure, and board-facing explanation.
Boards reviewing executive director or senior leadership compensation
Executive directors trying to make pay bands clearer and more consistent
Nonprofits preparing for growth, succession, or new leadership roles
Organizations that need compensation context but are not ready for a full specialist study
Teams that want better documentation before a board vote or budget cycle
What does a nonprofit compensation consultant do?
Do you set exact salaries or guarantee pay outcomes?
Can this support executive director compensation review?
Is this the same as a legal reasonableness opinion?
Can you help create salary bands?