Nonprofit executive in a coaching conversation with a professional leadership coach
Back to Insights
Leadership

Nonprofit Executive Coaching: What It Is, When You Need It, and How to Find the Right Coach

DG
Drew GiddingsFounder & Principal Consultant
February 25, 2026
20 min read
Photo by Christina @ wocintechchat.com on Unsplash

Most nonprofit executive directors operate without the one resource that leaders in every other sector consider essential: a coach. This practitioner's guide covers what nonprofit executive coaching actually is, when it makes the biggest difference, what to look for in a coach, and how to build a coaching engagement that produces real leadership growth — not just another line item in your professional development budget.

Key Takeaways

Executive coaching is a structured leadership development tool — distinct from consulting, therapy, and mentoring — that helps nonprofit leaders see blind spots, navigate complexity, and build capacity
The five highest-impact moments for coaching are: first year in role, major organizational change, leadership plateau, strained board dynamics, and burnout risk
Look for coaches with deep nonprofit sector knowledge, formal credentials, a clear philosophy, strong chemistry, and a relevant track record — avoid coaches who promise specific outcomes
Effective engagements run six to twelve months with sessions every two to three weeks, cost $5,000-$15,000, and require strict confidentiality between coach and leader
Equitable access to coaching is an organizational strategy — boards should fund coaching as standard executive support, and funders should include coaching in capacity building grants

Most nonprofit executive directors are leading alone.

Not because they lack talent, commitment, or vision. They are leading alone because the nonprofit sector has built a leadership structure that isolates the people at the top. The executive director reports to a volunteer board that meets quarterly. The senior staff report to the executive director. And the executive director reports to no one who has the time, the context, or the expertise to help them grow as a leader.

This is not a personal failing. It is a structural one. And it has measurable consequences: executive director turnover in the nonprofit sector remains persistently high, with studies indicating that the average tenure hovers around three to five years. Leaders burn out, organizations lose institutional knowledge, and the communities they serve bear the cost of discontinuity.

Executive coaching addresses this structural gap directly. Not as therapy, not as consulting, and not as mentoring — though it shares elements with all three. Coaching is a structured, ongoing relationship with a professional who helps you see what you cannot see alone, make better decisions under pressure, and develop the leadership capacity your organization needs to fulfill its mission.

In our work with more than 100 mission-driven organizations, we have seen executive coaching transform leadership effectiveness when done well. We have also seen it waste money and time when done poorly. This guide covers both — what makes coaching work, and what to watch out for.

What Nonprofit Executive Coaching Actually Is — and What It Is Not

There is meaningful confusion in the nonprofit sector about what executive coaching means. The term gets applied to everything from one-off consultations to life coaching to executive search firms that offer "coaching" as a value-add. Clarity matters here, because choosing the wrong type of support wastes resources and delays the leadership growth your organization needs.

What Executive Coaching Is

Executive coaching is a structured, confidential, one-on-one professional relationship between a leader and a trained coach. The coach's role is to help the leader:

Identify patterns that limit effectiveness. Every leader has blind spots — habits, assumptions, and default behaviors that worked at one stage of their career but are now limiting their impact. A skilled coach helps you see these patterns clearly and develop alternatives.

Navigate complex decisions with greater clarity. Nonprofit leaders face decisions that involve competing stakeholder interests, limited resources, and high emotional stakes. Coaching provides a thinking partner who can help you examine a decision from multiple angles before you act.

Build specific leadership competencies. Whether it is managing a difficult board relationship, leading through organizational change, developing executive presence with funders, or delegating effectively, coaching targets the specific skills your current role demands.

Maintain accountability for growth. Intentions are not outcomes. A coach holds you accountable for the commitments you make to your own development — not in a punitive way, but in a way that ensures your growth goals do not perpetually yield to operational urgency.

What Executive Coaching Is Not

It is not consulting. A consultant diagnoses organizational problems and prescribes solutions. A coach helps you develop the capacity to diagnose and solve problems yourself. The difference matters: consulting creates dependency, coaching creates capability.

It is not therapy. Therapy addresses psychological health and healing from past experiences. Coaching is forward-looking and performance-oriented. A good coach will recognize when a client needs therapeutic support and refer appropriately, but the coaching relationship itself is focused on professional effectiveness.

It is not mentoring. A mentor shares their own experience and advises based on what worked for them. A coach draws out your own thinking, challenges your assumptions, and supports you in finding solutions that fit your specific context. Mentors tell. Coaches ask.

It is not a performance improvement plan. Coaching is a development tool for leaders who are already effective and want to become more so. Using coaching as a remedial intervention sends the wrong signal and undermines the trust that makes coaching work.

"The best coaching relationships are not about fixing what is broken. They are about building what is possible — and most nonprofit leaders have far more leadership potential than their current structures allow them to develop."

When Nonprofit Leaders Need Executive Coaching Most

Coaching is not equally valuable at every moment. There are specific inflection points in a nonprofit leader's career when coaching produces outsized returns — and times when other forms of support are more appropriate.

The Five High-Impact Coaching Moments

1. The First Year in a New Executive Role

The transition into an executive director role — or any C-suite nonprofit position — is the single highest-risk period in a leader's tenure. Research on executive transitions consistently shows that the first 90 to 180 days establish patterns that persist throughout a leader's time in the role. Leaders who establish strong board relationships, build senior team trust, and demonstrate early strategic clarity in this window are dramatically more likely to succeed long-term.

A coach during this period helps you navigate the political landscape of a new organization, avoid common transition mistakes (moving too fast, moving too slow, inheriting the previous leader's priorities without question), and build the relationships that will sustain your leadership.

2. During Major Organizational Change

Mergers, significant growth, leadership transitions, strategic pivots, and funding crises all create conditions where the leadership demands on an executive director exceed what they have previously navigated. These moments require new competencies developed quickly — exactly what coaching is designed to produce.

As we discuss in our guide on nonprofit succession planning, leadership transitions are among the most vulnerable moments in an organization's life. Coaching support for incoming leaders during these transitions is one of the most cost-effective investments a board can make.

3. When a Good Leader Has Plateaued

Some of the best nonprofit leaders we work with are highly effective operators who have reached the ceiling of what they can achieve with their current leadership toolkit. They deliver results, manage their teams well, and maintain board confidence — but they sense that something is missing. They are managing the organization rather than leading it.

Coaching at this stage is transformational because the foundation is already strong. The leader does not need to learn the basics. They need to develop the next level of strategic thinking, executive presence, or visionary leadership that will take their organization from good to exceptional.

4. When Board-Executive Director Dynamics Are Strained

The relationship between an executive director and the board of directors is the single most important relationship in nonprofit governance. When that relationship is healthy, the organization thrives. When it is strained, everything suffers — strategy, fundraising, staff morale, and ultimately the communities the organization serves.

Coaching can help an executive director develop strategies for managing board dynamics that go beyond surface-level communication fixes. A skilled coach helps you understand your own contribution to the dynamic, develop new approaches to board engagement, and build the political savvy that effective executive leadership requires. For deeper context on the structural dynamics at play, our board development guide covers the governance foundations that support healthy board-executive relationships.

5. When the Leader Is at Risk of Burnout

Nonprofit leadership is inherently demanding, and the sector's culture of self-sacrifice makes burnout not just common but expected. By the time most leaders recognize they are burning out, they have already been operating at diminished capacity for months.

A coach provides an early warning system. Regular coaching sessions create a structured space for leaders to examine their energy, their boundaries, and their sustainability — before crisis hits. This is not therapy; it is strategic self-management. A leader who burns out costs the organization far more than a coaching engagement ever will. As we explore in our guide on retaining nonprofit talent, leadership sustainability is an organizational strategy, not just a personal one.

When Coaching Is Not the Right Answer

Coaching is not appropriate when:

  • The organization has a structural problem, not a leadership problem. If the board is dysfunctional, the funding model is broken, or the organizational culture is toxic, coaching the executive director will not fix these issues. The organization needs consulting or intervention, not coaching.
  • The leader is not willing to be coached. Coaching requires openness, honesty, and a genuine desire to grow. If a leader enters coaching under pressure from the board or as a condition of continued employment, the engagement is unlikely to produce meaningful results.
  • The leader needs skills training, not development. If a new executive director has never read a financial statement, they need training, not coaching. Coaching builds on existing competence; it does not replace foundational skill-building.
  • Tangible Takeaway

    Before engaging a coach, honestly assess which of the five high-impact moments applies to your situation. If none of them do, coaching may still be valuable — but the ROI will be lower than at these inflection points. Prioritize coaching during transitions, growth moments, and relationship challenges where the leadership stakes are highest.

    The Equity Dimension of Executive Coaching

    Any conversation about nonprofit executive coaching that does not address equity is incomplete. The coaching industry has the same diversity gaps as the nonprofit sector itself, and those gaps have real consequences for leaders of color, leaders from under-resourced communities, and leaders whose lived experience does not match the dominant cultural norms of the coaching profession.

    The Access Gap

    Executive coaching in the nonprofit sector is unevenly distributed. Organizations with larger budgets, stronger board networks, and more established institutional cultures are more likely to provide coaching for their leaders. Emerging leaders, leaders of smaller organizations, and leaders of grassroots organizations — who often face the most complex leadership challenges — are the least likely to have access to coaching support.

    This disparity matters because it creates a development gap that compounds over time. Leaders with coaching support develop faster, navigate challenges more effectively, and build more sustainable careers. Leaders without it are left to figure things out alone — and the burnout and turnover data shows what happens when they do.

    Finding Culturally Competent Coaches

    For leaders of color and leaders from marginalized communities, the identity and cultural competence of a coach is not a nice-to-have — it is a prerequisite for effective coaching. A coach who does not understand the additional burdens that leaders of color carry — the code-switching, the representational pressure, the microaggressions, the expectation of being a spokesperson for their entire community — cannot provide effective support.

    When evaluating coaches, ask directly about their experience coaching across lines of difference. A culturally competent coach will:

    • Acknowledge the systemic factors that shape your leadership experience, not just the individual ones
    • Understand that leadership development for leaders of color includes navigating white-dominant organizational cultures
    • Have done their own identity work — they are not learning about systemic inequality from you
    • Be willing to be honest about the limits of their own cultural competence

    Advocating for Equitable Access

    If you are a board member or funder reading this, consider what role you can play in making coaching more accessible:

  • Fund coaching as part of leadership development grants. When funders include coaching in capacity building grants, it removes the budget barrier for smaller organizations.
  • Include coaching in executive transition support. When your grantee hires a new executive director, offering coaching support during the transition is one of the highest-impact investments you can make.
  • Support coaching cohorts for leaders of color. Group coaching models that are specifically designed for leaders of color provide both the coaching benefit and the peer support that these leaders need.
  • "Equitable access to executive coaching is not about generosity. It is about acknowledging that the leaders who face the most complex challenges deserve the same development resources as leaders in better-resourced organizations."

    What to Look for in a Nonprofit Executive Coach

    Not all coaches are equally effective, and the coaching industry is largely unregulated. Anyone can call themselves an executive coach, and many do. Choosing the wrong coach wastes money and — more importantly — wastes the limited time and trust that a leader invests in the relationship.

    The Five Qualities That Matter Most

    1. Deep Nonprofit Sector Knowledge

    The nonprofit sector has unique structural dynamics that generic executive coaches do not understand: board governance, fund development, mission-driven culture, resource constraints, stakeholder complexity, and the particular emotional demands of mission-driven work. A coach who has worked exclusively in the corporate sector will misread nonprofit leadership challenges because the context is fundamentally different.

    Look for a coach with direct nonprofit leadership experience — ideally someone who has served as an executive director or in a senior nonprofit leadership role. This is not elitism; it is pattern recognition. A coach who has lived the challenges you face can distinguish between leadership issues and structural issues in ways that an outsider cannot.

    2. Coaching Credentials and Training

    While the coaching industry is not formally regulated, there are credentialing bodies that establish professional standards. The International Coaching Federation (ICF) offers the most widely recognized credentials — Associate Certified Coach (ACC), Professional Certified Coach (PCC), and Master Certified Coach (MCC). These credentials indicate that a coach has completed formal training, logged supervised coaching hours, and agreed to ethical standards.

    Credentials alone do not make a great coach. But the absence of any training should raise questions about whether a potential coach has developed the foundational skills that effective coaching requires.

    3. A Coaching Philosophy You Can Articulate

    A good coach should be able to clearly explain their approach. How do they structure engagements? What frameworks do they use? How do they measure progress? If a coach cannot articulate their methodology, they are likely operating on intuition rather than professional practice.

    Ask potential coaches: What is your coaching philosophy? How do you approach the first session? What does a typical engagement look like? How will I know if this is working? The answers will tell you whether this coach has a thoughtful, intentional practice — or is just having conversations and calling it coaching.

    4. Chemistry and Trust

    Coaching only works in the presence of trust. You must be able to be honest with your coach about your struggles, your doubts, and your mistakes. If you do not feel comfortable being vulnerable with a particular coach, the engagement will remain surface-level regardless of the coach's qualifications.

    Most reputable coaches offer a chemistry session — a brief initial meeting to see if the fit is right. Take this session seriously. Pay attention to how the coach listens, what questions they ask, and whether you feel genuinely heard. Trust your instincts about the relationship.

    5. A Track Record with Similar Leaders

    Ask for references from leaders who are similar to you — similar organization size, similar leadership challenges, similar career stage. A coach who has successfully supported a leader through their first executive director role is not necessarily the right coach for a leader navigating a major organizational merger. Context matters.

    Red Flags to Watch For

    Coaches who promise specific outcomes. No ethical coach guarantees results. Coaching creates the conditions for growth; the leader does the growing. A coach who promises you will "transform your leadership in 90 days" is selling, not coaching.

    Coaches who position themselves as the expert on your organization. A coach's job is to help you think more clearly, not to tell you what to do. If a potential coach spends the chemistry session giving you advice rather than asking you questions, they are likely a consultant wearing a coaching hat.

    Coaches who are not willing to discuss their approach to cultural competence. If a coach becomes defensive or dismissive when you ask about their experience working across lines of difference, that is information about how they will respond when difficult identity-related topics arise in coaching.

    Coaches who do not have a clear confidentiality protocol. Especially if the board is sponsoring the coaching, you need to understand exactly what will and will not be shared with anyone outside the coaching relationship. A coach who is vague about confidentiality boundaries is a liability.

    Tangible Takeaway

    Before hiring a coach, interview at least three candidates. Ask each one: What is your coaching philosophy? What is your experience in the nonprofit sector? How do you approach cultural competence? What does confidentiality look like in your practice? Can you provide references from leaders in similar situations to mine? The answers to these five questions will tell you almost everything you need to know.

    Structuring a Coaching Engagement That Works

    The structure of a coaching engagement matters as much as the coach you choose. A poorly structured engagement — too short, too infrequent, or without clear goals — produces disappointing results even with an excellent coach.

    Duration and Frequency

    Most effective coaching engagements run six to twelve months. Shorter engagements (three months) can work for specific, focused goals — navigating a board crisis, preparing for a major fundraising campaign, onboarding into a new role. But leadership development is not fast. The patterns that limit your effectiveness took years to develop, and replacing them with new patterns requires sustained practice and reinforcement.

    Sessions should occur every two to three weeks. Weekly sessions can feel too frequent — leaders need time between sessions to practice what they are developing. Monthly sessions are too infrequent — too much happens between meetings, and the continuity of the coaching work suffers.

    Setting Clear Goals

    Every coaching engagement should begin with a goal-setting process that identifies three to five development priorities. These should be:

  • Specific enough to measure. "Become a better leader" is not a coaching goal. "Develop the ability to have difficult performance conversations with direct reports within the first week of an issue arising" is.
  • Connected to organizational outcomes. Your coaching goals should serve both your personal development and the organization's needs. The board and the executive director should agree on the broad development areas, even if the specific work within coaching is confidential.
  • Revisited quarterly. Leadership needs shift. A coaching goal that made sense in January may be irrelevant by April if the organizational context has changed. Build in regular goal reviews.
  • The Role of the Board

    When the board sponsors executive coaching — as it should for any executive director — the board and the executive director should agree on broad development themes while respecting the confidentiality of the coaching process. The board should know that the executive director is working on, say, "strategic communications and board engagement." The board should not have access to session notes, specific conversations, or the coach's assessment of the executive director.

    This boundary is essential. If the executive director believes that what they share in coaching might reach the board, they will not be honest — and dishonest coaching is useless coaching.

    Measuring Impact

    Coaching impact is real but not always immediately quantifiable. Look for indicators at multiple levels:

    Behavioral change. Is the leader doing things differently? Making decisions more confidently? Handling board interactions with more skill? Delegating more effectively? These changes are observable even if they are not numerical.

    Organizational outcomes. Over the course of a coaching engagement, you should see improvements in team morale, board satisfaction, fundraising effectiveness, or other organizational metrics that connect to the leader's development areas.

    Self-reported growth. The leader themselves is often the best judge of whether coaching is working. Regular self-assessment — what has changed, what has not, what feels different — provides important data.

    360-degree feedback. For longer engagements, a mid-point 360-degree feedback process — where board members, direct reports, and peers provide anonymous assessments of the leader's effectiveness — can provide powerful data on whether coaching is producing visible change.

    The ROI of Nonprofit Executive Coaching

    Boards and funders sometimes hesitate to invest in executive coaching because the return is less tangible than, say, a new database or a strategic planning retreat. This hesitation is understandable but misguided. The evidence base for coaching effectiveness is substantial.

    The International Coaching Federation and PricewaterhouseCoopers conducted a global study that found organizations investing in coaching reported a median return on investment of seven times the initial coaching investment. While this study covered all sectors, the dynamics that drive coaching ROI — improved leadership decision-making, reduced turnover, better stakeholder management — apply with particular force in the nonprofit sector, where leadership quality is the single most important determinant of organizational effectiveness.

    Consider the alternative costs:

  • Executive director turnover costs an organization an estimated 100 to 200 percent of the departing leader's annual salary when you factor in recruitment, transition, lost institutional knowledge, and the productivity dip during the new leader's ramp-up period.
  • A poorly managed board relationship can lead to loss of board members, reduced fundraising, and governance dysfunction that takes years to repair.
  • Leadership burnout affects not just the leader but the entire staff — as we discuss in our guide on retaining nonprofit talent, leadership health is directly connected to organizational health.
  • A six-month coaching engagement typically costs between $5,000 and $15,000 for an experienced nonprofit coach. Compared to the cost of leadership failure, this is not an expense — it is insurance.

    "The question is not whether you can afford executive coaching. The question is whether you can afford to leave your organization's most important asset — its leadership — without the development support that every other sector considers standard."

    Building a Coaching Culture in Your Organization

    Executive coaching should not be a benefit reserved for the executive director. The organizations that develop the strongest leadership pipelines are those that build coaching into their organizational culture at multiple levels.

    What a Coaching Culture Looks Like

    Managers use coaching skills in supervision. The most effective supervisors do not just assign tasks and evaluate performance. They ask powerful questions, listen deeply, and support their direct reports in developing solutions rather than providing answers. These are coaching skills, and they can be taught.

    Peer coaching is encouraged and supported. Leaders at similar levels in the organization can provide powerful coaching to one another — if they have the skills. Investing in peer coaching training creates a web of support that costs nothing after the initial training investment.

    The board includes coaching in the executive director's compensation. When coaching is a standard part of the executive director's support package — like health insurance or professional development funds — it normalizes the practice and removes the stigma of "needing help."

    Emerging leaders receive coaching as they transition into management. The transition from individual contributor to manager is one of the most challenging career shifts in any sector. Providing coaching support during this transition prevents the leadership mistakes that lead to staff turnover and team dysfunction. As we explore in our capacity building guide, investing in emerging leaders is one of the most effective ways to strengthen organizational capacity.

    Questions for Reflection
    • Does your organization currently provide executive coaching for the executive director? If not, why not?
    • If coaching is provided, is it genuinely confidential, or does the board have access to session content?
    • Are coaching skills taught to managers as part of their supervisory development?
    • What would it look like to include coaching support in your next executive transition plan?
    • How could your organization make coaching accessible to emerging leaders, not just senior executives?

    How to Get Started

    If you are a nonprofit leader considering coaching, or a board member thinking about sponsoring coaching for your executive director, here is a practical path forward:

    Step 1: Clarify the purpose. What specific leadership challenges or development goals would coaching address? The clearer you are about the purpose, the better you will be at selecting the right coach.

    Step 2: Set a realistic budget. Plan for a six-month engagement at minimum. Budget $5,000 to $15,000 depending on the coach's experience and your geographic market. If budget is a barrier, look into coaching cohort programs, sliding-scale coaches, or foundation grants that include leadership development funds.

    Step 3: Interview multiple coaches. Talk to at least three coaches. Use the five evaluation criteria from this guide: sector knowledge, credentials, clear philosophy, chemistry, and relevant track record.

    Step 4: Establish clear boundaries. Before the engagement begins, agree on confidentiality protocols, reporting expectations (if any) to the board, and the goal-setting process. Put these agreements in writing.

    Step 5: Commit to the process. Coaching only works if you show up fully — prepared for sessions, honest about your challenges, and willing to practice new behaviors between sessions. The coach provides the framework; you provide the effort.

    At Giddings Consulting Group, we work with nonprofit leaders and boards to identify the right coaching and leadership development strategies for their specific organizational context. Whether you are considering coaching for the first time or building a coaching culture across your organization, the starting point is the same: an honest assessment of where your leadership is, where it needs to be, and what support will close that gap.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is nonprofit executive coaching? Nonprofit executive coaching is a structured, confidential, one-on-one professional relationship between a nonprofit leader and a trained coach. The coach helps the leader identify patterns that limit effectiveness, navigate complex decisions, build specific leadership competencies, and maintain accountability for personal and professional growth. It is distinct from consulting, which prescribes solutions; therapy, which addresses psychological health; and mentoring, which shares personal experience. Coaching develops the leader's own capacity to lead more effectively.

    How much does nonprofit executive coaching cost? Nonprofit executive coaching typically costs between $5,000 and $15,000 for a six-month engagement, depending on the coach's experience, credentials, and geographic market. Some coaches offer sliding-scale pricing for smaller nonprofit organizations. Group coaching cohorts and peer coaching programs offer lower-cost alternatives. Many capacity building grants from foundations include provisions for leadership development that can be used toward coaching.

    When should a nonprofit executive director get a coach? The five highest-impact moments for coaching are: the first year in a new executive role, during major organizational change, when a good leader has plateaued, when board-executive dynamics are strained, and when the leader is at risk of burnout. Coaching is most effective at these inflection points because the leadership stakes are highest and the potential return on the coaching investment is greatest.

    What should I look for in a nonprofit executive coach? The five most important qualities are: deep nonprofit sector knowledge (ideally someone who has held nonprofit leadership roles), coaching credentials and formal training, a clearly articulated coaching philosophy, strong interpersonal chemistry and trust, and a track record with leaders in similar situations to yours. Red flags include coaches who promise specific outcomes, position themselves as experts on your organization, avoid questions about cultural competence, or are vague about confidentiality protocols.

    How is executive coaching different from consulting? A consultant diagnoses organizational problems and prescribes solutions based on their expertise. A coach helps you develop the capacity to diagnose and solve problems yourself. Consulting creates dependency on external expertise; coaching builds internal leadership capability. Both are valuable, but they serve different purposes. If your organization has a specific operational problem that needs expert diagnosis, you need a consultant. If your challenge is developing your own effectiveness as a leader, you need a coach.

    How do I know if executive coaching is working? Look for indicators at multiple levels: behavioral change (is the leader making decisions differently, handling relationships with more skill?), organizational outcomes (improvements in team morale, board satisfaction, fundraising effectiveness), self-reported growth (does the leader feel more confident and capable?), and 360-degree feedback (do board members, staff, and peers observe visible changes?). Most effective coaching engagements show observable results within three to four months, though deeper leadership transformation may take longer.

    Should the board sponsor executive coaching for the nonprofit leader? Yes. Boards that invest in executive coaching for their executive director are investing in the organization's most important asset. Coaching should be included in the executive director's compensation package alongside professional development and health benefits. The key requirement is that coaching content remains strictly confidential between the coach and the executive director — the board may know the broad development themes but should never have access to session content. Without this confidentiality, the coaching relationship cannot function effectively.

    What is the ROI of nonprofit executive coaching? Research by the International Coaching Federation and PricewaterhouseCoopers found that organizations investing in coaching reported a median return of seven times the initial investment. In the nonprofit sector specifically, the ROI calculation includes reduced executive turnover costs (estimated at 100-200% of the departing leader's annual salary), improved board relationships, stronger fundraising outcomes, and reduced leadership burnout — all of which have measurable financial and organizational impact.

    Can executive coaching help with board relationship challenges? Yes, board-executive dynamics are one of the most common and productive areas for coaching. A skilled coach helps the executive director understand their own contribution to board dynamics, develop new strategies for board engagement, build political savvy, and manage the complex power dynamics inherent in reporting to a volunteer governing body. Coaching addresses the interpersonal and strategic dimensions of the board relationship that structural governance changes alone cannot fix.

    How do I find an executive coach who understands equity and cultural competence? Ask directly about the coach's experience working across lines of difference. A culturally competent coach will acknowledge systemic factors that shape leadership experience, understand the additional burdens that leaders of color carry in nonprofit organizations, have done their own identity work, and be willing to discuss the limits of their cultural competence honestly. Look for coaches who have specific experience coaching leaders from backgrounds similar to yours, and ask for references from those leaders.

    nonprofit executive coachingnonprofit leadershipexecutive director developmentnonprofit coachingleadership developmentboard governanceequity-centered leadership
    Share this article
    DG

    About the Author

    Drew Giddings

    Founder & Principal Consultant

    Drew Giddings brings over 15 years of experience working with mission-driven organizations to strengthen their capacity for equity and community impact. His work focuses on helping nonprofits build sustainable strategies that center community voice and create lasting change.

    Ready to Transform Your Organization?

    Let's discuss how equity-centered strategic planning can strengthen your mission and community impact.

    Schedule a Consultation